Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Maintenance or Mission--Which one will get you there?

We just got back from a very nice vacation. We drove from western Michigan to Northeast Indiana to St. Louis, Missouri, to Warsaw, Missouri back again to Western Michigan--about 1800 miles in all. As we were driving something became abundantly clear to me--we spend ENTIRELY TOO MUCH TIME and MONEY on MAINTENANCE!!

That whole trip I never once FELT the importance of spending money on oil changes or tires. Sure, it could be argued that had I not spent the time and money on gas, oil changes, tires, brake repairs, air filters, wiper blades, wiper fluid, insurance, registration, etc. we would not be able to drive, but I don't buy it!!

What we really need to do with our cars is make them MISSIONAL!! That's right, it makes perfect sense. We use cars to get places, they take us on our missions, so we need to invest all of our car money into the MISSION of auto-ownership! Our car trip would have been much nicer had we had more room. Think of all the extra seats we could put into our car if we just didn't buy gas. And if we would cut out oil changes we could make those extra seats leather with massagers, cut out tire maintenance and those seats could be heated and cooled!!

If we stopped wasting all of our time and resources "maintaining" we could have high-def, flat-screen DVD players for all the passengers. Everyone could have their own choice of seat type, climate control, and entertainment choices. Why stop there? Why not give everyone their own STEERING WHEEL!!! If it wasn't for all that wasted time and money on maintaining we could make the mission of car ownership a truly spiritual and self-satisfying experience for all.

But, then again, if I would have done that I would not have made it to my destination. Oh well, at least I wouldn't be labeled a "maintenance" car owner!!

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

PICTURES!

jWinters said...

Hey there Jim,
I really enjoyed this metaphor. Unfortunately, I think you're using the wrong definition of "missional". It sounds like what you're going for is "attractional" (better seats, etc). I posted some further thoughts using the "missional car" idea on my blog. Thanks be to God for your safe return!

in Christ,
jW

Jim Roemke said...

Jay,
Unfortunately, it seems that to many people that is what passes as missional. That kind of "mission" is what I am speaking against in this post. I am by no means against the mission of the Gospel, but I do think in our synod there is a great deal of confusion and disagreement as to what that means and how it is done. Thanks for your input.